| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4600H vs Core i5-1038NG7


Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 4600H is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
706e5
Core
Renoir
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
FCBGA1344
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2020
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
65.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
243.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
23.2k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
21.2k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
9.4k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
11.54k (x1.61)
TOTAL
54.11k
65.35k (x1.21)

Multithread

4600H

i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
94.68k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
103.38k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
35.79k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
9.33k (x1.95)
TOTAL
334.72k
243.18k (x0.73)

Performance/W
4600H
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
3692 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
8685 points/W

Performance/GHz
4600H
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
3037 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
17197 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4