| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4600H vs Core i5-1035G1


Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 4600H is 2 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
706e5
Core
Renoir
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
171.65k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
21.5k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
17.71k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
7.92k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
8.24k (x1.15)
TOTAL
54.11k
55.37k (x1.02)

Multithread

4600H

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
73.03k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
68.19k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
24.89k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
5.54k (x1.16)
TOTAL
334.72k
171.65k (x0.51)

Performance/W
4600H
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
4600H
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4