| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4600H vs Core i3-8100


Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i3-8100 gets 200.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 4600H is 1.7 times faster than the i3-8100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
906eb
Core
Renoir
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2020
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
59.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
200.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
24.47k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
21.52k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
4.95k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
8.24k (x1.15)
TOTAL
54.11k
59.18k (x1.09)

Multithread

4600H

i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
92.86k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
83.05k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
18.55k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
5.93k (x1.24)
TOTAL
334.72k
200.4k (x0.6)

Performance/W
4600H
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
1429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
3083 points/W

Performance/GHz
4600H
i3-8100
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
6797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5977 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
16438 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4