| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4600H vs Core i3-6006U


Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-6006U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i3-6006U gets 68.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 4600H is 4.9 times faster than the i3-6006U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
406e3
Core
Renoir
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2020
November 2016
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
31.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
68.38k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
12.89k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
11.72k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
2.74k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
3.95k (x0.55)
TOTAL
54.11k
31.3k (x0.58)

Multithread

4600H

i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
29.95k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
27.93k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
6.74k (x0.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
3.77k (x0.79)
TOTAL
334.72k
68.38k (x0.2)

Performance/W
4600H
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
1997 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
1862 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
449 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
251 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
4559 points/W

Performance/GHz
4600H
i3-6006U
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
6444 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5858 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
1371 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
1975 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
15649 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4