Ryzen 5 4600H vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
Description
Both models 4600H and 4900HS are based on Zen 2 architecture.
Zen 2 is fabricated on the 7nm process from TSMC and it’s the third generation of Zen CPUs. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. Zen 2 CPUs are divided into 3 categories: Matisse (desktop), Rome (Server) and Castle Peak (high-end desktop).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.1 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen 2 is fabricated on the 7nm process from TSMC and it’s the third generation of Zen CPUs. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. Zen 2 CPUs are divided into 3 categories: Matisse (desktop), Rome (Server) and Castle Peak (high-end desktop).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the 4900HS gets 360.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.1 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
860f01
Core
Renoir
Renoir
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2020
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
53k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
360.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
14.87k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
21.53k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
8.39k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
8.21k (x1.15)
TOTAL
54.11k
53k (x0.98)
Multithread
4600H
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
124.63k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
158.62k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
69.79k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
7.53k (x1.58)
TOTAL
334.72k
360.57k (x1.08)
Performance/W
4600H
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
3561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
4532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
1994 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
215 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
10302 points/W
Performance/GHz
4600H
4900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
3457 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5007 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
1952 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
12326 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4