| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4600H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE


Description
Both models 4600H and 4750GE are based on Zen 2 architecture.

Zen 2 is fabricated on the 7nm process from TSMC and it’s the third generation of Zen CPUs. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. Zen 2 CPUs are divided into 3 categories: Matisse (desktop), Rome (Server) and Castle Peak (high-end desktop).

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the 4750GE gets 469.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4750GE is 1.4 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
860f01
Core
Renoir
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2020
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
60.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
469.67k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
16.95k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
26.26k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
9.4k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
8.38k (x1.17)
TOTAL
54.11k
60.99k (x1.13)

Multithread

4600H

4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
159.87k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
215.44k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
88.45k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
5.9k (x1.24)
TOTAL
334.72k
469.67k (x1.4)

Performance/W
4600H
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
4568 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
6155 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
2527 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
169 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
13419 points/W

Performance/GHz
4600H
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
3942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
6107 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
2185 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
1950 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
14184 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4