Ryzen 5 4600H vs 3600
Description
Both models 4600H and 3600 are based on Zen 2 architecture.
Zen 2 is fabricated on the 7nm process from TSMC and it’s the third generation of Zen CPUs. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. Zen 2 CPUs are divided into 3 categories: Matisse (desktop), Rome (Server) and Castle Peak (high-end desktop).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen 2 is fabricated on the 7nm process from TSMC and it’s the third generation of Zen CPUs. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. Zen 2 CPUs are divided into 3 categories: Matisse (desktop), Rome (Server) and Castle Peak (high-end desktop).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
870f10
Core
Renoir
Matisse
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
348.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
16.04k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
24.47k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
8.38k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
21.66k (x3.02)
TOTAL
54.11k
70.55k (x1.3)
Multithread
4600H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
113.63k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
143.55k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
63.84k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
27.34k (x5.73)
TOTAL
334.72k
348.35k (x1.04)
Performance/W
4600H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
4600H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4