Ryzen 5 4600H vs Ryzen 3 3200U
Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 3200U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 5.5 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the 3200U gets 61.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 5.5 times faster than the 3200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
810f81
Core
Renoir
Picasso
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
38.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
61.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
11.13k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
19.38k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
4.47k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
3.87k (x0.54)
TOTAL
54.11k
38.85k (x0.72)
Multithread
4600H
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
17.13k (x0.15)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
30.56k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
9.44k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
4.09k (x0.86)
TOTAL
334.72k
61.23k (x0.18)
Performance/W
4600H
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
1142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
2038 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
273 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
4082 points/W
Performance/GHz
4600H
3200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
3181 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5536 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
11099 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4