| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4600H vs Ryzen 3 3200G


Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4600H is 2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
810f81
Core
Renoir
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
168.69k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
14.48k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
23.84k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
5.43k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
5.46k (x0.76)
TOTAL
54.11k
49.21k (x0.91)

Multithread

4600H

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
54.39k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
88.77k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
20.04k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
5.48k (x1.15)
TOTAL
334.72k
168.69k (x0.5)

Performance/W
4600H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
2595 points/W

Performance/GHz
4600H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4