Ryzen 5 4600H vs Athlon X4 950
Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 950 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 3.4 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 3.4 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
660f51
Core
Renoir
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2020
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
34.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
99.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
950
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
12.44k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
15.96k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
3.54k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
3k (x0.42)
TOTAL
54.11k
34.93k (x0.65)
Multithread
4600H
950
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
40.75k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
42.07k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
12.53k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
4.45k (x0.93)
TOTAL
334.72k
99.8k (x0.3)
Performance/W
4600H
950
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
627 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
193 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
1535 points/W
Performance/GHz
4600H
950
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
3274 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
4199 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
931 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
788 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
9193 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4