Ryzen 5 4600H vs Core i5-11400F
Description
The 4600H is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.5 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4600H gets a score of 334.7 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.5 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
a0671
Core
Renoir
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
54.11k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
334.72k points
495.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4600H
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
31.66k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
26.21k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.63k
11.96k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.17k
18.5k (x2.58)
TOTAL
54.11k
88.34k (x1.63)
Multithread
4600H
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
117.98k
210.36k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
146.43k
203.84k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
65.54k
72.05k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
9.4k (x1.97)
TOTAL
334.72k
495.65k (x1.48)
Performance/W
4600H
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2622 points/W
3236 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3254 points/W
3136 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1456 points/W
1108 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
106 points/W
145 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
7625 points/W
Performance/GHz
4600H
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3870 points/GHz
7196 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5705 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2158 points/GHz
2718 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1793 points/GHz
4205 points/GHz
TOTAL
13526 points/GHz
20076 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4