Ryzen 5 4500U vs Core i9-9900K
Description
The 4500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4500U gets a score of 194.3 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 2.7 times faster than the 4500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4500U gets a score of 194.3 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 2.7 times faster than the 4500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
906ed
Core
Renoir
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/16
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2020
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
52.44k points
81.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.34k points
529.32k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4500U
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.37k
32.08k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
23.02k
28.17k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
6.68k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
14.98k (x2.37)
TOTAL
52.44k
81.91k (x1.56)
Multithread
4500U
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
52.52k
242.98k (x4.63)
Test#2 (FP)
99.84k
220.16k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
53.97k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
12.22k (x2.2)
TOTAL
194.34k
529.32k (x2.72)
Performance/W
4500U
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3502 points/W
2558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6656 points/W
2317 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2428 points/W
568 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
370 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
12956 points/W
5572 points/W
Performance/GHz
4500U
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3842 points/GHz
6417 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
5634 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1935 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1579 points/GHz
2996 points/GHz
TOTAL
13111 points/GHz
16382 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4