Ryzen 5 4500U vs Core i9-9880H
Description
The 4500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4500U gets a score of 194.3 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 2 times faster than the 4500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4500U gets a score of 194.3 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9880H is 2 times faster than the 4500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
906ed
Core
Renoir
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16386 kB
Date
January 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.44k points
73.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.34k points
381.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4500U
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.37k
27.81k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
23.02k
25.88k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
5.65k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
14.19k (x2.25)
TOTAL
52.44k
73.53k (x1.4)
Multithread
4500U
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
52.52k
175.69k (x3.34)
Test#2 (FP)
99.84k
166.56k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
35.04k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
4.23k (x0.76)
TOTAL
194.34k
381.53k (x1.96)
Performance/W
4500U
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
3502 points/W
3904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6656 points/W
3701 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2428 points/W
779 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
370 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
12956 points/W
8478 points/W
Performance/GHz
4500U
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
3842 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
5392 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1935 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1579 points/GHz
2956 points/GHz
TOTAL
13111 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4