| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4500U vs Core i7-7700HQ


Description
The 4500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4500U gets a score of 194.3 k points while the i7-7700HQ gets 208.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 1.1 times faster than the 4500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
906e9
Core
Renoir
Kaby Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
52.44k points
56.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.34k points
208.33k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4500U
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
15.37k
23.27k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
23.02k
20.35k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
4.76k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
7.92k (x1.25)
TOTAL
52.44k
56.29k (x1.07)

Multithread

4500U

i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
52.52k
93.11k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
99.84k
89.03k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
21.29k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
4.9k (x0.88)
TOTAL
194.34k
208.33k (x1.07)

Performance/W
4500U
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3502 points/W
2069 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6656 points/W
1978 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2428 points/W
473 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
370 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
12956 points/W
4629 points/W

Performance/GHz
4500U
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3842 points/GHz
6124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
5354 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1935 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1579 points/GHz
2083 points/GHz
TOTAL
13111 points/GHz
14813 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4