| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4500U vs Core i5-8365U


Description
The 4500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-8365U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4500U gets a score of 194.3 k points while the i5-8365U gets 197.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-8365U is 1 times faster than the 4500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
806ec
Core
Renoir
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2020
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.44k points
59.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.34k points
197.46k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4500U
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.37k
24.37k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
23.02k
22.68k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
4.98k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
7.7k (x1.22)
TOTAL
52.44k
59.73k (x1.14)

Multithread

4500U

i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
52.52k
89.45k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
99.84k
85.57k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
19.02k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
3.41k (x0.61)
TOTAL
194.34k
197.46k (x1.02)

Performance/W
4500U
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
3502 points/W
5964 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6656 points/W
5705 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2428 points/W
1268 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
370 points/W
227 points/W
TOTAL
12956 points/W
13164 points/W

Performance/GHz
4500U
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
3842 points/GHz
5944 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
5531 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1935 points/GHz
1214 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1579 points/GHz
1879 points/GHz
TOTAL
13111 points/GHz
14568 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4