| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4500U vs Core i5-4210U


Description
The 4500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-4210U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4500U gets a score of 194.3 k points while the i5-4210U gets 57.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 4500U is 3.4 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
40651
Core
Renoir
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1169
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2020
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
52.44k points
27.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.34k points
57.58k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4500U
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.37k
13.79k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
23.02k
7.79k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
3.11k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
2.72k (x0.43)
TOTAL
52.44k
27.41k (x0.52)

Multithread

4500U

i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
52.52k
28.78k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
99.84k
18.99k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
7.21k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
2.6k (x0.47)
TOTAL
194.34k
57.58k (x0.3)

Performance/W
4500U
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
3502 points/W
1919 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6656 points/W
1266 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2428 points/W
481 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
370 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
12956 points/W
3839 points/W

Performance/GHz
4500U
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
3842 points/GHz
5108 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
2884 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1935 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1579 points/GHz
1008 points/GHz
TOTAL
13111 points/GHz
10151 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4