Ryzen 5 4500U vs Core i5-1038NG7
Description
The 4500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4500U gets a score of 194.3 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1038NG7 is 1.3 times faster than the 4500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4500U gets a score of 194.3 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1038NG7 is 1.3 times faster than the 4500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
706e5
Core
Renoir
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
FCBGA1344
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2020
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
52.44k points
65.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.34k points
243.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4500U
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
15.37k
23.2k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
23.02k
21.2k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
9.4k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
11.54k (x1.83)
TOTAL
52.44k
65.35k (x1.25)
Multithread
4500U
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
52.52k
94.68k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
99.84k
103.38k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
35.79k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
9.33k (x1.68)
TOTAL
194.34k
243.18k (x1.25)
Performance/W
4500U
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
3502 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6656 points/W
3692 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2428 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
370 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
12956 points/W
8685 points/W
Performance/GHz
4500U
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
3842 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
5580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1935 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1579 points/GHz
3037 points/GHz
TOTAL
13111 points/GHz
17197 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4