Ryzen 5 4500U vs Core i3-10100T
Description
The 4500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4500U gets a score of 194.3 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.2 times faster than the 4500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4500U gets a score of 194.3 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100T is 1.2 times faster than the 4500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
a0653
Core
Renoir
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
52.44k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.34k points
227.67k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4500U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.37k
24.31k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
23.02k
22.15k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
5.14k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
8.46k (x1.34)
TOTAL
52.44k
60.06k (x1.15)
Multithread
4500U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
52.52k
101.48k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
99.84k
98.04k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
24.28k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
3.86k (x0.7)
TOTAL
194.34k
227.67k (x1.17)
Performance/W
4500U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3502 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6656 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2428 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
370 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
12956 points/W
3503 points/W
Performance/GHz
4500U
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3842 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1935 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1579 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
13111 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4