| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 4500U vs 2400G


Description
The 4500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4500U gets a score of 194.3 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 1 times faster than the 4500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
810f10
Core
Renoir
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
52.44k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.34k points
198.27k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4500U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.37k
14.2k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
23.02k
23.23k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
5.35k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
5.18k (x0.82)
TOTAL
52.44k
47.96k (x0.91)

Multithread

4500U

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
52.52k
58.24k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
99.84k
105.72k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
28.73k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
5.59k (x1.01)
TOTAL
194.34k
198.27k (x1.02)

Performance/W
4500U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3502 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6656 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2428 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
370 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
12956 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
4500U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3842 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1935 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1579 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
13111 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4