Ryzen 5 4500U vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The 4500U is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4500U gets a score of 194.3 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.1 times faster than the 4500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4500U gets a score of 194.3 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.1 times faster than the 4500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
90675
Core
Renoir
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/6
6/12
TDP
15 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2020
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
52.44k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
194.34k points
399.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4500U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.37k
33.85k (x2.2)
Test#2 (FP)
23.02k
20.33k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
10.51k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.32k
11.77k (x1.86)
TOTAL
52.44k
76.46k (x1.46)
Multithread
4500U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
52.52k
174.21k (x3.32)
Test#2 (FP)
99.84k
141.31k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.42k
64.86k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
19.01k (x3.42)
TOTAL
194.34k
399.39k (x2.06)
Performance/W
4500U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3502 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6656 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2428 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
370 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
12956 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
4500U
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3842 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1935 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1579 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
13111 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4