Ryzen 5 3600X vs Core i9-10980XE
Description
The 3600X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600X gets a score of 376.2 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 3.3 times faster than the 3600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600X gets a score of 376.2 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 3.3 times faster than the 3600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
50657
Core
Matisse
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
6/12
18/36
TDP
95 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x16384 kB
25344 kB
Date
July 2019
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
69.9k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
376.22k points
1241.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600X
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
16.21k
29.53k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
22.99k
22.59k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
5.99k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.94k
10.22k (x0.47)
TOTAL
69.9k
68.33k (x0.98)
Multithread
3600X
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
121.94k
587.06k (x4.81)
Test#2 (FP)
153.22k
496.41k (x3.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.74k
134.66k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
33.31k
22.99k (x0.69)
TOTAL
376.22k
1241.12k (x3.3)
Performance/W
3600X
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
1284 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1613 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
713 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
351 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
3960 points/W
7522 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600X
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3685 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1991 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4986 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
15887 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4