Ryzen 5 3600X vs Core i3-8350K
Description
The 3600X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600X gets a score of 376.2 k points while the i3-8350K gets 237.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600X is 1.6 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600X gets a score of 376.2 k points while the i3-8350K gets 237.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600X is 1.6 times faster than the i3-8350K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
906eb
Core
Matisse
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
95 W
91 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
69.9k points
68.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
376.22k points
237.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600X
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
16.21k
27.29k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
22.99k
24.19k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.76k
5.75k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.94k
11.13k (x0.51)
TOTAL
69.9k
68.36k (x0.98)
Multithread
3600X
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
121.94k
107.78k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
153.22k
95.93k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
67.74k
22.65k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
33.31k
11.26k (x0.34)
TOTAL
376.22k
237.63k (x0.63)
Performance/W
3600X
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
1284 points/W
1184 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1613 points/W
1054 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
713 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
351 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
3960 points/W
2611 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600X
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
3685 points/GHz
6823 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5225 points/GHz
6048 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1991 points/GHz
1436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4986 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
TOTAL
15887 points/GHz
17091 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4