| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.2 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
50654
Core
Matisse
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
11264 kB
Date
July 2019
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
281.48k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3600
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
4.2k
3k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
12.29k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.5k
3.64k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.79k
6.55k (x0.28)
TOTAL
52.85k
25.46k (x0.48)

Multithread

3600

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
20.42k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
108.04k
95.83k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.81k
30.88k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.39k
9.7k (x0.27)
TOTAL
223.36k
156.83k (x0.7)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
18.78k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
16.25k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
3.99k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
6.8k (x0.31)
TOTAL
70.55k
45.82k (x0.65)

Multithread

3600

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
133.55k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
108.43k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
30.02k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
9.48k (x0.35)
TOTAL
348.35k
281.48k (x0.81)

Performance/W
3600
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
3600
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4