Ryzen 5 3600 vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.3 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.3 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
306f2
Core
Matisse
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
30720 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
452.9k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3600
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4.2k
3.52k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
8.68k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.5k
2.83k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.79k
3.13k (x0.13)
TOTAL
52.85k
18.17k (x0.34)
Multithread
3600
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
32.7k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
108.04k
105.18k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.81k
35.18k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.39k
9.54k (x0.26)
TOTAL
223.36k
182.59k (x0.82)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3600
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
15.38k
11.08k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
21.94k
9.57k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.97k
3.18k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.76k
3.28k (x0.13)
TOTAL
70.05k
27.11k (x0.39)
Multithread
3600
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
96.91k
139.07k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
135.12k
133.47k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.39k
46.6k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
56.43k
6.65k (x0.12)
TOTAL
358.85k
325.78k (x0.91)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3600
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
15.04k
11.18k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
10.06k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.57k
3.21k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.71k
3.12k (x0.14)
TOTAL
66.27k
27.57k (x0.42)
Multithread
3600
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
94.36k
140.98k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
141.73k
145.37k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.38k
45.62k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.72k
6.75k (x0.21)
TOTAL
338.19k
338.73k (x1)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
18.62k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
10.49k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
4.04k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
3.26k (x0.15)
TOTAL
70.55k
36.41k (x0.52)
Multithread
3600
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
236.25k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
151.05k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
58.9k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
6.7k (x0.25)
TOTAL
348.35k
452.9k (x1.3)
Performance/W
3600
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
3774 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4