Ryzen 5 3600 vs Core i9-10900K
Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i9-10900K gets 685.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 2 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i9-10900K gets 685.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 2 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0655
Core
Matisse
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/20
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
20480 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
80.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
685.65k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3600
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.38k
19.5k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
21.94k
28.01k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.97k
7.45k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.76k
15.82k (x0.64)
TOTAL
70.05k
70.79k (x1.01)
Multithread
3600
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
96.91k
194.49k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
135.12k
312.59k (x2.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.39k
89.14k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
56.43k
12.58k (x0.22)
TOTAL
358.85k
608.81k (x1.7)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
32.67k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
28.49k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
6.53k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
12.72k (x0.59)
TOTAL
70.55k
80.41k (x1.14)
Multithread
3600
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
307.39k (x2.71)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
298.47k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
72.94k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
6.85k (x0.25)
TOTAL
348.35k
685.65k (x1.97)
Performance/W
3600
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
5485 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
6282 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
5479 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
2445 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
15463 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4