Ryzen 5 3600 vs Core i7-9750H
Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i7-9750H gets 286.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i7-9750H gets 286.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
906ea
Core
Matisse
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
65.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
286.43k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
25.93k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
22.84k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
5.11k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
11.46k (x0.53)
TOTAL
70.55k
65.33k (x0.93)
Multithread
3600
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
130.68k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
119.91k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
28.76k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
7.08k (x0.26)
TOTAL
348.35k
286.43k (x0.82)
Performance/W
3600
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
2904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
2665 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
639 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
157 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
6365 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
5762 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
5075 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
1135 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
14519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4