Ryzen 5 3600 vs Core i5-4210U
Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-4210U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i5-4210U gets 57.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 6 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i5-4210U gets 57.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 6 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
40651
Core
Matisse
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1169
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
3072 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
27.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
57.58k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3600
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.2k
2.95k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
7.38k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.5k
3.11k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.79k
2.91k (x0.12)
TOTAL
52.85k
16.35k (x0.31)
Multithread
3600
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
4.86k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
108.04k
17.41k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.81k
7.09k (x0.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.39k
2.5k (x0.07)
TOTAL
223.36k
31.86k (x0.14)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3600
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.38k
9.26k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
21.94k
8.2k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.97k
3.57k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.76k
2.92k (x0.12)
TOTAL
70.05k
23.95k (x0.34)
Multithread
3600
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
96.91k
17.53k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
135.12k
17.56k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.39k
7.65k (x0.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
56.43k
2.49k (x0.04)
TOTAL
358.85k
45.22k (x0.13)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3600
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.04k
5.05k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
5.31k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.57k
2.1k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.71k
1.41k (x0.06)
TOTAL
66.27k
13.87k (x0.21)
Multithread
3600
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
94.36k
9.01k (x0.1)
Test#2 (FP)
141.73k
16.3k (x0.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.38k
4.64k (x0.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.72k
2.16k (x0.07)
TOTAL
338.19k
32.1k (x0.09)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
13.79k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
7.79k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
3.11k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
2.72k (x0.13)
TOTAL
70.55k
27.41k (x0.39)
Multithread
3600
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
28.78k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
18.99k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
7.21k (x0.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
2.6k (x0.1)
TOTAL
348.35k
57.58k (x0.17)
Performance/W
3600
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
1919 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
1266 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
481 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
3839 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
5108 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
2884 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
1008 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
10151 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4