| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Core i5-10300H


Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0652
Core
Matisse
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3600
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.04k
15.65k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
23.13k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.57k
5.66k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.71k
11.43k (x0.53)
TOTAL
66.27k
55.87k (x0.84)

Multithread

3600

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
94.36k
26.77k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
141.73k
43.81k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.38k
10.17k (x0.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.72k
11.91k (x0.36)
TOTAL
338.19k
92.66k (x0.27)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
27.14k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
24.75k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
5.73k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
11.84k (x0.55)
TOTAL
70.55k
69.47k (x0.98)

Multithread

3600

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
105.77k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
107.47k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
24.82k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
8.02k (x0.29)
TOTAL
348.35k
246.07k (x0.71)

Performance/W
3600
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
3600
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4