Ryzen 5 3600 vs Core i3-9100T
Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.8 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.8 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
906eb
Core
Matisse
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2019
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
60.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
192.88k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3600
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.2k
3.79k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
15.65k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.5k
4.59k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.79k
7.78k (x0.33)
TOTAL
52.85k
31.81k (x0.6)
Multithread
3600
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
13.97k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
108.04k
57.83k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.81k
17.03k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.39k
4.35k (x0.12)
TOTAL
223.36k
93.18k (x0.42)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3600
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.38k
13.74k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
21.94k
19.7k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.97k
4.86k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.76k
8.61k (x0.35)
TOTAL
70.05k
46.91k (x0.67)
Multithread
3600
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
96.91k
50.5k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
135.12k
72.58k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.39k
18.09k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
56.43k
4.28k (x0.08)
TOTAL
358.85k
145.45k (x0.41)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3600
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.04k
13.6k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
20.58k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.57k
4.76k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.71k
8.8k (x0.41)
TOTAL
66.27k
47.74k (x0.72)
Multithread
3600
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
94.36k
50.18k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
141.73k
75.99k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.38k
17.66k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.72k
4.12k (x0.13)
TOTAL
338.19k
147.95k (x0.44)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
24.89k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
21.82k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
4.83k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
8.63k (x0.4)
TOTAL
70.55k
60.16k (x0.85)
Multithread
3600
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
89.4k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
81.19k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
18.06k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
4.24k (x0.16)
TOTAL
348.35k
192.88k (x0.55)
Performance/W
3600
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
2554 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
2320 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
5511 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
6727 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
5897 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
16260 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4