Ryzen 5 3600 vs Core i3-10105
Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.4 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0653
Core
Matisse
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
253.93k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3600
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
4.2k
4.5k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
18.39k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.5k
5.78k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.79k
8.3k (x0.35)
TOTAL
52.85k
36.97k (x0.7)
Multithread
3600
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
16.13k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
108.04k
75.62k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.81k
27.88k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.39k
3.57k (x0.1)
TOTAL
223.36k
123.2k (x0.55)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3600
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
15.38k
16.19k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
21.94k
23.07k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.97k
6.04k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.76k
8.46k (x0.34)
TOTAL
70.05k
53.77k (x0.77)
Multithread
3600
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
96.91k
57.59k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
135.12k
100.63k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.39k
28.59k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
56.43k
3.56k (x0.06)
TOTAL
358.85k
190.38k (x0.53)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3600
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
15.04k
16.11k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
24.12k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.57k
5.71k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.71k
7.89k (x0.36)
TOTAL
66.27k
53.83k (x0.81)
Multithread
3600
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
94.36k
58.25k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
141.73k
105.73k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.38k
27.8k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.72k
3.51k (x0.11)
TOTAL
338.19k
195.29k (x0.58)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
28.9k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
25.85k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
5.88k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
8.29k (x0.38)
TOTAL
70.55k
68.92k (x0.98)
Multithread
3600
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
111.69k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
110.23k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
28.45k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
3.56k (x0.13)
TOTAL
348.35k
253.93k (x0.73)
Performance/W
3600
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
3907 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4