Ryzen 5 3600 vs Core i3-10100T
Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.5 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0653
Core
Matisse
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
227.67k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3600
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.2k
4.32k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
15.7k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.5k
5.04k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.79k
7.68k (x0.32)
TOTAL
52.85k
32.73k (x0.62)
Multithread
3600
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
16.59k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
108.04k
71.1k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.81k
23.26k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.39k
3.86k (x0.11)
TOTAL
223.36k
114.81k (x0.51)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3600
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.38k
13.84k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
21.94k
19.79k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.97k
5.28k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.76k
8.31k (x0.34)
TOTAL
70.05k
47.22k (x0.67)
Multithread
3600
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
96.91k
54.67k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
135.12k
90.71k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.39k
24.11k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
56.43k
3.85k (x0.07)
TOTAL
358.85k
173.34k (x0.48)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3600
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.04k
13.88k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
20.94k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.57k
5.18k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.71k
8.2k (x0.38)
TOTAL
66.27k
48.19k (x0.73)
Multithread
3600
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
94.36k
54.88k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
141.73k
93.17k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.38k
23.34k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.72k
3.85k (x0.12)
TOTAL
338.19k
175.24k (x0.52)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
24.31k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
22.15k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
5.14k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
8.46k (x0.39)
TOTAL
70.55k
60.06k (x0.85)
Multithread
3600
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
101.48k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
98.04k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
24.28k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
3.86k (x0.14)
TOTAL
348.35k
227.67k (x0.65)
Performance/W
3600
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
3503 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4