| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 9 5950X


Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5950X is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the 5950X gets 1081 k points.

Summarizing, the 5950X is 3.1 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
a20f10
Core
Matisse
Vermeer
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
16/32
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
16x32+16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
16x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
July 2019
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
87.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
1080.96k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
22.91k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
26.24k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
11.87k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
26.28k (x1.21)
TOTAL
70.55k
87.3k (x1.24)

Multithread

3600

5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
359.17k (x3.16)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
479.04k (x3.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
214.59k (x3.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
28.16k (x1.03)
TOTAL
348.35k
1080.96k (x3.1)

Performance/W
3600
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
3421 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
4562 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
2044 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
268 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
10295 points/W

Performance/GHz
3600
5950X
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
4676 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
2423 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
17817 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4