Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 7 1700
Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
800f11
Core
Matisse
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
333.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3600
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
15.04k
13.95k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
22.02k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.57k
5.17k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.71k
16.61k (x0.77)
TOTAL
66.27k
57.75k (x0.87)
Multithread
3600
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
94.36k
120.59k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
141.73k
197.34k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.38k
56.83k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.72k
6.41k (x0.2)
TOTAL
338.19k
381.16k (x1.13)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
12.65k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
20.95k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
4.63k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
14.47k (x0.67)
TOTAL
70.55k
52.69k (x0.75)
Multithread
3600
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
101.78k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
177.57k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
47.18k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
6.78k (x0.25)
TOTAL
348.35k
333.31k (x0.96)
Performance/W
3600
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
5128 points/W
Performance/GHz
3600
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4