| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Ryzen 3 3200G


Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 2.1 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
810f81
Core
Matisse
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
168.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3600
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.2k
3.89k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
17.94k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.5k
5.34k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.79k
6.62k (x0.28)
TOTAL
52.85k
33.79k (x0.64)

Multithread

3600

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
15.07k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
108.04k
66.84k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.81k
19.56k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.39k
6.54k (x0.18)
TOTAL
223.36k
108.01k (x0.48)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3600
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.38k
14.3k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
21.94k
21.69k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.97k
5.42k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.76k
6.6k (x0.27)
TOTAL
70.05k
48k (x0.69)

Multithread

3600

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
96.91k
55.45k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
135.12k
83.13k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.39k
20.76k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
56.43k
6.58k (x0.12)
TOTAL
358.85k
165.91k (x0.46)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3600
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.04k
13.05k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
22.88k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.57k
5.39k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.71k
7.31k (x0.34)
TOTAL
66.27k
48.63k (x0.73)

Multithread

3600

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
94.36k
51.73k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
141.73k
87.74k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.38k
20.74k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
32.72k
6.57k (x0.2)
TOTAL
338.19k
166.79k (x0.49)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
14.48k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
23.84k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
5.43k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
5.46k (x0.25)
TOTAL
70.55k
49.21k (x0.7)

Multithread

3600

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
54.39k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
88.77k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
20.04k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
5.48k (x0.2)
TOTAL
348.35k
168.69k (x0.48)

Performance/W
3600
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
2595 points/W

Performance/GHz
3600
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4