| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Core i7-12700K


Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-12700K is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i7-12700K gets 1034.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700K is 3 times faster than the 3600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
90672
Core
Matisse
Alder Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/20
TDP
65 W
190 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32/4x64+8x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
25600 kB
Date
July 2019
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
110.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
1034.06k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3600
i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.2k
8.44k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
17.36k
21.1k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.5k
14.52k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.79k
12.87k (x0.54)
TOTAL
52.85k
56.92k (x1.08)

Multithread

3600

i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.11k
70.7k (x3.2)
Test#2 (FP)
108.04k
251.29k (x2.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56.81k
159.92k (x2.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.39k
32.47k (x0.89)
TOTAL
223.36k
514.38k (x2.3)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
52.13k (x3.25)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
28.97k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
15.04k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
14.07k (x0.65)
TOTAL
70.55k
110.2k (x1.56)

Multithread

3600

i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
458.8k (x4.04)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
377.45k (x2.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
171.31k (x2.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
26.51k (x0.97)
TOTAL
348.35k
1034.06k (x2.97)

Performance/W
3600
i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
2415 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
1987 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
902 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
140 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
5442 points/W

Performance/GHz
3600
i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
10425 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
3008 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
2813 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
22040 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4