| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Core i7-1185G7


Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i7-1185G7 gets 230.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-1185G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
806c1
Core
Matisse
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
60.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
230.91k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
24.35k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
20.07k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
8.61k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
7.84k (x0.36)
TOTAL
70.55k
60.87k (x0.86)

Multithread

3600

i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
93.58k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
94.71k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
33.28k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
9.34k (x0.34)
TOTAL
348.35k
230.91k (x0.66)

Performance/W
3600
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
3342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
3383 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
334 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
8247 points/W

Performance/GHz
3600
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
5074 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
4182 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
1633 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
12682 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4