| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3600 vs Core i5-11300H


Description
The 3600 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3600 gets a score of 348.4 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
806c1
Core
Matisse
Tiger Lake H35
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
70.55k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
348.35k points
285.75k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3600
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.04k
25.83k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
24.47k
23.56k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.38k
9.2k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.66k
5.06k (x0.23)
TOTAL
70.55k
63.64k (x0.9)

Multithread

3600

i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
113.63k
116.87k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
143.55k
121.08k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
63.84k
41.8k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.34k
6k (x0.22)
TOTAL
348.35k
285.75k (x0.82)

Performance/W
3600
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1748 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2208 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
982 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
421 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
5359 points/W
8164 points/W

Performance/GHz
3600
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3819 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5825 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1995 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
16797 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4