| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3550H vs Xeon E5-2670 v3


Description
The 3550H is based on Zen+ architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 2.5 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
306f2
Core
Picasso
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
35 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
45.07k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
178.26k points
452.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3550H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3.63k
3.52k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
16.69k
8.68k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.92k
2.83k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
5k
3.13k (x0.63)
TOTAL
30.24k
18.17k (x0.6)

Multithread

3550H

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
13.62k
32.7k (x2.4)
Test#2 (FP)
65.71k
105.18k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.7k
35.18k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.64k
9.54k (x1.69)
TOTAL
108.67k
182.59k (x1.68)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3550H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
18.62k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
22.34k
10.49k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
4.04k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
3.26k (x0.77)
TOTAL
45.07k
36.41k (x0.81)

Multithread

3550H

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
52.21k
236.25k (x4.52)
Test#2 (FP)
95.66k
151.05k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.54k
58.9k (x2.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
6.7k (x1.38)
TOTAL
178.26k
452.9k (x2.54)

Performance/W
3550H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1492 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2733 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
730 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
5093 points/W
3774 points/W

Performance/GHz
3550H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6038 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1145 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
12182 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4