| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3550H vs Xeon Bronze 3206R


Description
The 3550H is based on Zen+ architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the 3206R gets 216 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.2 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
50657
Core
Picasso
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2019
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
45.07k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
178.26k points
216.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3550H
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
3.63k
1.97k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
16.69k
8.15k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.92k
2.37k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
5k
4.84k (x0.97)
TOTAL
30.24k
17.32k (x0.57)

Multithread

3550H

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
13.62k
15.73k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
65.71k
64.78k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.7k
18.06k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.64k
5.21k (x0.92)
TOTAL
108.67k
103.77k (x0.95)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3550H
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
12.92k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
22.34k
10.97k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
2.54k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
5.09k (x1.2)
TOTAL
45.07k
31.52k (x0.7)

Multithread

3550H

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
52.21k
103.33k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
95.66k
87.67k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.54k
20.1k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
4.91k (x1.01)
TOTAL
178.26k
216.02k (x1.21)

Performance/W
3550H
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1492 points/W
1216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2733 points/W
1031 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
730 points/W
237 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
58 points/W
TOTAL
5093 points/W
2541 points/W

Performance/GHz
3550H
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
6801 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6038 points/GHz
5774 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1145 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
TOTAL
12182 points/GHz
16588 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4