| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3550H vs Core i9-10980XE


Description
The 3550H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 7 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
50657
Core
Picasso
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
18/36
TDP
35 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
25344 kB
Date
January 2019
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
45.07k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
178.26k points
1241.12k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3550H
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3.63k
4.52k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
16.69k
17.94k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.92k
5.5k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
5k
9.64k (x1.93)
TOTAL
30.24k
37.6k (x1.24)

Multithread

3550H

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
13.62k
84.93k (x6.24)
Test#2 (FP)
65.71k
409.55k (x6.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.7k
122.88k (x5.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.64k
22.12k (x3.92)
TOTAL
108.67k
639.48k (x5.88)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3550H
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
29.53k (x2.19)
Test#2 (FP)
22.34k
22.59k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
5.99k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
10.22k (x2.41)
TOTAL
45.07k
68.33k (x1.52)

Multithread

3550H

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
52.21k
587.06k (x11.24)
Test#2 (FP)
95.66k
496.41k (x5.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.54k
134.66k (x5.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
22.99k (x4.74)
TOTAL
178.26k
1241.12k (x6.96)

Performance/W
3550H
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
1492 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2733 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
730 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
5093 points/W
7522 points/W

Performance/GHz
3550H
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6038 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1145 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
12182 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4