Ryzen 5 3550H vs Core i9-10900X
Description
The 3550H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 3.5 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 3.5 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
50657
Core
Picasso
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/20
TDP
35 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
10x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
19712 kB
Date
January 2019
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
45.07k points
62.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
178.26k points
632.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3550H
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
25.97k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
22.34k
22.37k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
5.3k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
8.63k (x2.04)
TOTAL
45.07k
62.28k (x1.38)
Multithread
3550H
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
52.21k
281.98k (x5.4)
Test#2 (FP)
95.66k
259.01k (x2.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.54k
64.87k (x2.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
26.5k (x5.47)
TOTAL
178.26k
632.35k (x3.55)
Performance/W
3550H
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
1492 points/W
1709 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2733 points/W
1570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
730 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
5093 points/W
3832 points/W
Performance/GHz
3550H
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
5526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6038 points/GHz
4760 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1145 points/GHz
1835 points/GHz
TOTAL
12182 points/GHz
13250 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4