| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3550H vs Core i7-9750H


Description
The 3550H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.6 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
906ed
Core
Picasso
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
45.07k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
178.26k points
276.46k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3550H
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.63k
4.53k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
16.69k
18.24k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.92k
5.76k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
5k
13.01k (x2.6)
TOTAL
30.24k
41.54k (x1.37)

Multithread

3550H

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.62k
24.3k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
65.71k
97.88k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.7k
29.85k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.64k
11.93k (x2.12)
TOTAL
108.67k
163.95k (x1.51)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3550H
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
25.22k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
22.34k
21.97k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
5.02k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
10.71k (x2.53)
TOTAL
45.07k
62.92k (x1.4)

Multithread

3550H

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
52.21k
125.56k (x2.4)
Test#2 (FP)
95.66k
115.86k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.54k
25.63k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
9.4k (x1.94)
TOTAL
178.26k
276.46k (x1.55)

Performance/W
3550H
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1492 points/W
2790 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2733 points/W
2575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
730 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
5093 points/W
6144 points/W

Performance/GHz
3550H
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
5605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6038 points/GHz
4882 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1145 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
TOTAL
12182 points/GHz
13982 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4