Ryzen 5 3550H vs Core i7-9750H
Description
The 3550H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the i7-9750H gets 286.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.6 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the i7-9750H gets 286.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.6 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
906ea
Core
Picasso
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
45.07k points
65.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
178.26k points
286.43k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3550H
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
25.93k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
22.34k
22.84k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
5.11k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
11.46k (x2.7)
TOTAL
45.07k
65.33k (x1.45)
Multithread
3550H
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
52.21k
130.68k (x2.5)
Test#2 (FP)
95.66k
119.91k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.54k
28.76k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
7.08k (x1.46)
TOTAL
178.26k
286.43k (x1.61)
Performance/W
3550H
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1492 points/W
2904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2733 points/W
2665 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
730 points/W
639 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
157 points/W
TOTAL
5093 points/W
6365 points/W
Performance/GHz
3550H
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
5762 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6038 points/GHz
5075 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1135 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1145 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
12182 points/GHz
14519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4