Ryzen 5 3550H vs Core i7-9700F
Description
The 3550H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-9700F is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 108.7 k points while the i7-9700F gets 164.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700F is 1.5 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 108.7 k points while the i7-9700F gets 164.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700F is 1.5 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
906ed
Core
Picasso
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
45.07k points
60.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
178.26k points
269.85k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3550H
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3.63k
4.67k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
16.69k
17.16k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.92k
5.7k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
5k
14.37k (x2.87)
TOTAL
30.24k
41.9k (x1.39)
Multithread
3550H
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
13.62k
26.31k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
65.71k
97.53k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.7k
31.53k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.64k
8.94k (x1.59)
TOTAL
108.67k
164.31k (x1.51)
Performance/W
3550H
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
389 points/W
405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1877 points/W
1500 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
677 points/W
485 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
161 points/W
138 points/W
TOTAL
3105 points/W
2528 points/W
Performance/GHz
3550H
i7-9700F
Test#1 (Integers)
982 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4512 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1329 points/GHz
1212 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1352 points/GHz
3057 points/GHz
TOTAL
8174 points/GHz
8915 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4