Ryzen 5 3550H vs Core i7-7660U
Description
The 3550H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-7660U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the i7-7660U gets 132.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3550H is 1.3 times faster than the i7-7660U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the i7-7660U gets 132.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3550H is 1.3 times faster than the i7-7660U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
45.07k points
57.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
178.26k points
132.81k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3550H
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
22.46k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
22.34k
19.29k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
4.77k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
10.94k (x2.58)
TOTAL
45.07k
57.46k (x1.27)
Multithread
3550H
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
52.21k
56.67k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
95.66k
46.95k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.54k
12.36k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
16.84k (x3.47)
TOTAL
178.26k
132.81k (x0.75)
Performance/W
3550H
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
1492 points/W
3778 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2733 points/W
3130 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
730 points/W
824 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
1122 points/W
TOTAL
5093 points/W
8854 points/W
Performance/GHz
3550H
i7-7660U
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
5614 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6038 points/GHz
4823 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1193 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1145 points/GHz
2735 points/GHz
TOTAL
12182 points/GHz
14365 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4