| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3550H vs Core i7-6820HQ


Description
The 3550H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the i7-6820HQ gets 205.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6820HQ is 1.2 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
506e3
Core
Picasso
Skylake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
October 2015
Mean monothread perf.
45.07k points
50.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
178.26k points
205.89k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3550H
i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3.63k
3.18k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
16.69k
13.02k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.92k
4.17k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
5k
6.93k (x1.39)
TOTAL
30.24k
27.3k (x0.9)

Multithread

3550H

i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
13.62k
13.26k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
65.71k
62.23k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.7k
20.34k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.64k
5.46k (x0.97)
TOTAL
108.67k
101.29k (x0.93)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3550H
i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
20.99k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
22.34k
18.63k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
4.33k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
6.15k (x1.45)
TOTAL
45.07k
50.1k (x1.11)

Multithread

3550H

i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
52.21k
91.8k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
95.66k
87.24k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.54k
20.55k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
6.3k (x1.3)
TOTAL
178.26k
205.89k (x1.15)

Performance/W
3550H
i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1492 points/W
2040 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2733 points/W
1939 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
730 points/W
457 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
140 points/W
TOTAL
5093 points/W
4575 points/W

Performance/GHz
3550H
i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6038 points/GHz
5174 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1204 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1145 points/GHz
1708 points/GHz
TOTAL
12182 points/GHz
13917 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4