| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3550H vs Core i7-10750H


Description
The 3550H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 2 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
a0652
Core
Picasso
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
45.07k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
178.26k points
349.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3550H
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.63k
4.69k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
16.69k
18.71k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.92k
5.84k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
5k
13.95k (x2.79)
TOTAL
30.24k
43.19k (x1.43)

Multithread

3550H

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.62k
18.79k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
65.71k
86.1k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.7k
27.42k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.64k
5.27k (x0.94)
TOTAL
108.67k
137.58k (x1.27)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3550H
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
29.06k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
22.34k
26.49k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
6.23k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
13.89k (x3.28)
TOTAL
45.07k
75.67k (x1.68)

Multithread

3550H

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
52.21k
154.61k (x2.96)
Test#2 (FP)
95.66k
151.34k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.54k
36.33k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
6.93k (x1.43)
TOTAL
178.26k
349.21k (x1.96)

Performance/W
3550H
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1492 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2733 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
730 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
5093 points/W
7760 points/W

Performance/GHz
3550H
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6038 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1145 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
12182 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4