| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3550H vs Core i5-7300HQ


Description
The 3550H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the i5-7300HQ gets 168.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3550H is 1.1 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
906e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
45.07k points
53.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
178.26k points
168.81k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3550H
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3.63k
3.41k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
16.69k
14.14k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.92k
4.41k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
5k
8.87k (x1.77)
TOTAL
30.24k
30.83k (x1.02)

Multithread

3550H

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
13.62k
12.75k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
65.71k
52.88k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.7k
16.25k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.64k
8.98k (x1.59)
TOTAL
108.67k
90.85k (x0.84)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3550H
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
21.65k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
22.34k
19.18k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
4.38k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
8.3k (x1.96)
TOTAL
45.07k
53.51k (x1.19)

Multithread

3550H

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
52.21k
77.12k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
95.66k
68.68k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.54k
15.24k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
7.78k (x1.6)
TOTAL
178.26k
168.81k (x0.95)

Performance/W
3550H
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1492 points/W
1714 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2733 points/W
1526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
730 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
5093 points/W
3751 points/W

Performance/GHz
3550H
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
6186 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6038 points/GHz
5480 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1145 points/GHz
2372 points/GHz
TOTAL
12182 points/GHz
15289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4