| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3550H vs Core i3-6100T


Description
The 3550H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-6100T is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the i3-6100T gets 105.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3550H is 1.7 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
506e3
Core
Picasso
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2019
November 2015
Mean monothread perf.
45.07k points
43.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
178.26k points
105.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3550H
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.63k
3.14k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
16.69k
12.26k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.92k
3.94k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
5k
2.21k (x0.44)
TOTAL
30.24k
21.55k (x0.71)

Multithread

3550H

i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.62k
6.52k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
65.71k
30.61k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.7k
10.59k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.64k
2.77k (x0.49)
TOTAL
108.67k
50.49k (x0.46)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3550H
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
19.58k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
22.34k
16.97k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
3.91k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
3.47k (x0.82)
TOTAL
45.07k
43.92k (x0.97)

Multithread

3550H

i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
52.21k
47.02k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
95.66k
44.41k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.54k
9.93k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
3.85k (x0.79)
TOTAL
178.26k
105.21k (x0.59)

Performance/W
3550H
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1492 points/W
1344 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2733 points/W
1269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
730 points/W
284 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
5093 points/W
3006 points/W

Performance/GHz
3550H
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
6119 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6038 points/GHz
5303 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1145 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
12182 points/GHz
13726 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4