| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3550H vs 1600


Description
The 3550H is based on Zen+ architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the 1600 gets 303.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.7 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
800f82
Core
Picasso
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
45.07k points
58.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
178.26k points
303.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3550H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
14.08k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
22.34k
22.56k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
5.19k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
16.71k (x3.94)
TOTAL
45.07k
58.53k (x1.3)

Multithread

3550H

1600
Test#1 (Integers)
52.21k
86.62k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
95.66k
168.1k (x1.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.54k
43.51k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
5.16k (x1.07)
TOTAL
178.26k
303.4k (x1.7)

Performance/W
3550H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
1492 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2733 points/W
2586 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
730 points/W
669 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
5093 points/W
4668 points/W

Performance/GHz
3550H
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6038 points/GHz
6265 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1440 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1145 points/GHz
4642 points/GHz
TOTAL
12182 points/GHz
16259 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4